Ultrasonic Humidification in the Data Center Part II

In Part I of the Ultrasonic Humidification in the Data Center article, we examined Ultrasonic Humidification principles and learned why it is more efficient that traditional humidification methods. In Part II, we will examine detailed Ultrasonic Humidification design information as well as cost savings.

Little data is available to fully evaluate the use of Ultrasonic Humidification in data center design. We do know that several large data centers have begun implementing ultrasonic humidification as part of their cooling and environmental conditioning methods. It is known that companies such as Google, HP, Amazon and Bank of America each have multiple sites with Ultrasonic Humidification.

The main issue in developing statistics on the use of Ultrasonic Humidification is that there are relatively few industrial grade Ultrasonic Humidification manufacturers. As mentioned in Part I, Humidifirst and Stulz are the two major players in the Ultrasonic Humidification industry, and neither seem to have engaged in any serious marketing strategies like trade shows.

From Stulz

An average computer room with 10 air conditioners using an infrared humidification system will draw about 96 kw/h or 9.6 kw/h per air conditioner for humidification only. At a cost of $0.08 per kw/h, the energy cost of this system at an average yearly operation of 3,000 hours is $28,000. By comparison, for this computer room, 10 STULZ DAH 16 Ultrasonic humidifiers will draw only 4.95kw/h or 0.495kw/h per Humidifier at an approximate cost of $1,485 per year.

In this example, the STULZ system saves $26,515 on energy costs alone. Typical payback periods are 18 months.  If using 10 STULZ DRH 16 Ultrasonic humidifiers the draw would be 5.65kw/h or 0.565/h per Humidifier at an approximate cost of $1,695 per year.  In this example, the STULZ system saves $26,305 on energy cost alone.  Typical payback periods are 18 – 24 months for this system.

We spoke with Xcel Energy in Colorado, and what they had to say did jive with Stulz's claim, more or less:

Humidity controls (in data rooms) – The key here is not to over control.  Servers do not require tight humidity control…  Ultrasonic humidification is the best option, as it uses less energy, requires less maintenance.

Eager to bypass the marketing hype and perform our own analysis for DataCenterFix.com readers, we dove in head first into engineering manuals from both vendors (Humidifirst and Stulz), as well as CRAC unit vendors Liebert and Stulz.

Ultrasonic Humidification and LEED

It is possible to earn LEED points by making the switch from isothermal humidification in your data center to Ultrasonic Humidification. Some possible areas to earn LEED points:

lEAc1   Optimize Energy Performance – can help get points (up to10) by increasing building efficiency 38+% (retrofit) or 45+% (new)
lWEc3.1   Water Use Reduction – 1 point to help reduce building city water usage by 20%
lEQc3.2   A point for helping IAQ (RH%)
lEQc7.1/7.2   A point each for helping design and verify thermal comfort RH%

Ultrasonic Humidification Electrical Usage Comparison

Standard Liebert CW CRAH Humidification (Liebert CW 076-114 Models)

Humidifier Type Capacity (lbs/hr) kW Use
Infrared 22.1 9.6
Steam Canister 22 7.2

 

Ultrasonic Humidifiers by Stulz

Ultrasonic Capacity (lbs/hr) kW Use
Stulz 22 1 .565 + .145= 0.71

* All Data Taken from Corresponding Engineering Manuals
1 Stulz's largest single module is 17.6 lbs/hr. This example requires (1) 17.6 and (1) 4.4 lbs/hr units. In a data center environment with many CRAHs, the humidifier:CRAH ratio is lower

From this, we can see that using ultrasonic humidification uses approximately 92.6% less electricity than infrared humidification and 90.1% less electricity than steam generating humidifier canisters.

Before you jump to buy ultrasonic humidifiers, there are other factors you should consider. Ultrasonic humidifiers are more costly than traditional humidification systems. They requiree very clean water using either Reverse Osmosis or Deionization. Your water supply line(s) will need to be stainless steel or non-leaching PVC.

The best payback periods occur when starting from scratch with a new facility, but legacy data centers can still benefit. By installing an ultrasonic humidification system, you can disable the humidifiers in your CRAC and CRAH units. Who wouldn't want to save 93%?

* The intenet of this article is not to pit any particular brand against another. No CRAC unit manufacturer today integrates an ultrasonic humidification solution within a CRAC unit cabinet. All CRAC unit brands have a steam generating humidifier system available, and Liebert is the only brand that offers infrared humidification.

Companies: 

Comments

6

Very good, detailed write up on ultrasonic humidification. I do belive the ancillary costs are high and may deter some potential users.

I have to say I actually have 2 ultrasonic humidifiers in one of our smaller facilities, and have had great results. That's without knowing just how efficient it was. The contractor said it was very efficient but not that it was 90% more efficient. Wow. I stumbled upon this article, so that's great news.

I have seen a huge shift lately where it is less about up front cost and more about "what is the payoff"? It is interesting.

It used to be all I would hear is who is the low bidder or who is the cheapest, but many in the industry are looking towards what is more efficient?

The ASHRAE standard of 90.1 no longer excludes data centers and process cooling so our industry has to stop looking for the cheapest fix and start planning for the long haul! A more efficient piece of equipment in the data center can save big dollars in the long run and often pays for itself after a short period of time (relatively speaking)

Shane, good points. Cost is a tricky subject, because there are different costs associated with any project. My observations is that the bad economy made everyone focus on first costs, and some bad decisions can be made in order to save money up front, but pay for it in the end.

Certainly many in the industry looked that way but I still saw the end users asking for something that was more long term than cheap, and by long term I mean efficiencient greener technology. While I have never drawn up for Ultrasonic Humidification I have done much with units other than the "status quo" typical UPS's and CRAC/CRAH units... there is much more out there that can save data centers, large or small, a sizeable amount of money with marginal up front costs.

Excellent, excellent article on ultrasonic humidification. I admit I was not at all aware of the technology before reading Parts I & II. How hard is it to retrofit ultrasonic and replace standard humidification systems? Are there really a lot of data centers or other facilities that are using ultrasonic humidification?

Pages

Add new comment